Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The piece makes a scholarly argument and is written in scholarly language. It is neither a "conspiracy theory" nor a "rant".

You are using loaded rhetoric in an attempt to dismiss the piece without actually engaging with the ideas set forth in it.



And, of course, by brigading this down you are making the author's point for him.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: