Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> and that the spike was visible before the person was consciously taking the decision

Or does that just mean that our ability to measure when a decision is made is flawed?



That's the point of the article. It shows that the spike is irrelevant.


Right... I just never got why the experiment was significant in the first place.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: