The reasons you give for your disagreement with the OP are disagreements about features that the product (online movie delivery) should have: the price is too low or too high, sorting by IMDB ID is pointless. Feature disagreements are healthy. Yet you conclude with an ad hominem attack on the OP: they are immoral, they feel entitled, their concerns aren't real. Suspecting their motives (without much evidence, incidentally) doesn't justify dismissing their arguments out of hand.
If any of these were real concerns of pirates, movies out in theaters wouldn't be pirated.
Consider that "pirates" may not be a single uniform demographic.
I understand. But I'd bet that the vast majority of the signatories pirate first run movies.
They do not provide reasons. I posited several valid questions as to why would they want or demand those things. Because they do not provide reasons. They just make random demands and expect people to nod along and say "Yes, I agree."
I suspect their motives because they give no evidence or reason for their position.
Anything that can be asserted out of hand can be dismissed out of hand.
If any of these were real concerns of pirates, movies out in theaters wouldn't be pirated.
Consider that "pirates" may not be a single uniform demographic.