> I don't suppose it will persuade you that String (and many other classes) are in the Java.lang package.
From the prior source [1], immediately below the previously-quoted text:
"Trial Exhibit 980, The Java Application Programming Interface, Volume 1, is a book that covers four packages and refers to them as the "core packages." According to the back cover of the book, these four packages "are the foundation of the Java language. These libraries include java.lang, java.io, java.util, and java.net. These are the general purpose libraries fundamental to every Java program."
From the prior source [1], immediately below the previously-quoted text:
"Trial Exhibit 980, The Java Application Programming Interface, Volume 1, is a book that covers four packages and refers to them as the "core packages." According to the back cover of the book, these four packages "are the foundation of the Java language. These libraries include java.lang, java.io, java.util, and java.net. These are the general purpose libraries fundamental to every Java program."
[1] https://casetext.com/case/oracle-am-inc-v-google-inc-19#N196...