Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No it isn't. If you are asking someone where they get numbers from them write some incorrect numbers in the pursuit of whatever agenda is not a good look.

As of Monday,

- 274,504 people tested

- 8,400 cases

- 81 deaths

- 0.96% CFR

> so CFR is very close to IFR

On what basis do you make that statement. It's clearly indefensible

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/coronav...



> If you are asking someone where they get numbers from them write some incorrect numbers in the pursuit of whatever agenda is not a good look.

> As of Monday

> - 81 deaths

> - 0.96% CFR

I should say the same of you. Why are you posting numbers from 5 days ago? As of yesterday when I made that comment, Korea has 102 deaths and 1.16% CFR.

>> so CFR is very close to IFR

> On what basis do you make that statement. It's clearly indefensible

On the basis of the beginning of that same sentence, which you inexplicably did not quote.


That provides no basis? Feel free to elaborate


The more you test, the closer C will be to I.


What? That makes no sense




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: