Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I am going through pretty much an identical situation, except that a doctor prescribed antibiotics over the phone (assuming that the chest pressure and shortness of breath are due to the bacterial secondary infection) and I seem to be getting better.

The uncertainty has been eased by a little gizmo to measure the oxygen saturation in blood, which I got on amazon for £75 as soon as it was obvious that I could not breath well. I am probably fine as long as the saturation is > 92% or so.

Of course I have doubts about the reliability of a medical device off amazon, but it seems well done and, interestingly, it gives my mind a piece of seemingly objective truth to latch on.

[Edit - saturation level that will make me go to the hospital]



Blood oxygen saturation measurement techniques are pretty simple and well understood. Even the cheaper devices are usually accurate within a few percent. But if my level was getting to 85% I would head straight to the ER.


Yeah, I heard a lot higher number myself. Here's a study I found online about it:

"Conclusion: Among outpatients with pneumonia, oxygen saturations <90% were associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Our results indicate a hospital admission threshold of <92% would be safer and clinically better justified."

https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/52/3/325/305087


Thank you both. Note taken and comment edited.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: