As a representational painter, I've been waiting for someone to do a write-up on how/why these 'AI' paintings aren't going to be equivalent to human paintings until 'AI' is itself equivalent to humans.
Unfortunately, I haven't seen one yet. Maybe I'll have to do it myself.
IMO most 'generative art' is about as creative as a markov chain text, just with images as the input instead of words. It'll be a while before anyone can assert any sort of equivalence to human creativity and have it taken seriously
Unfortunately, I haven't seen one yet. Maybe I'll have to do it myself.