Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

In person teams are easy, and fully remote teams are easy too. A blend is extremely hard to get right. If you are in a meeting and some people are in the room while others are beamed in via a projector, the remote folks will always feel like second hand citizens. Depending on what kind of person you are, you might have enough skill to still participate in the discussion, but it will always be harder than just being in the room.

The best way to do partially remote is to have even the in-office people dial into the meetings individually as well. This also means trading in your whiteboard for remote collaboration tools like Lucidchart to allow remote folks to contribute as well.

If you actually do this, then I find that over time, the in-office people will begin to question why they are in the office and slowly drift off to be remote, leading to a 100% distributed team.

If you don't do this, then the remote people slowly get isolated and cease to become valuable contributors, eventually either leaving to fully distributed teams, or coming back into the office. Either way though, the partially distributed team eventually gravitates one way or the other.



I find these points definitely true;

- "conference rooms" are inferior to an individual at an individual laptop with a headset on.

- If any collection of people are at a conference room together they're exchanging looks off camera or notes before or after the meeting.

- Being fully remote makes you think about online documentation first, not copying it later.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: