Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why does it make sense for Apple to retain the commission on a charge back?

Because Apple might not be able to "take away" an app that was installed and then charged back instead of returned?



The fee is usually not returned to the merchant from payment provider in case of chargeback (in this case, merchant is Apple, but payment gateway may also not get the fee returned from acquiring bank also). In this case, Apple returning the fee result in them paying the refund out of their own pocket, which may be a source of abuse. This varies by payment provider, and some do charge extra in case this happens. I've posted a bit more about this in other subthread.[1]

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23996366


Apple has had the ability to remotely remove apps from iPhones since the iPhone 1.

https://techcrunch.com/2008/08/07/apple-can-remotely-remove-...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: