Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But an MBA who's a millionaire is competent to do any amount of private-investing?

And an MBA who's not a millionaire isn't competent to do any private investing, even with just a small amount of their own money?

Why should their net-worth be legally dispositive?



The millionaire can fuck up a few times and still be fine that's the real difference.


Only if they're wise enough to leave themself that wiggle room. It's a binary test, the 'accredited' can risk any amount.

So why not let anyone take a proportionate risk?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: