No it isn't, right to work exists in the entire EU since EU enforces it. Union participation is still way higher here than in USA. Obviously right to work isn't hurting union participation that much, or unions would be dead over here.
Banning right to work is just there to protect corrupt unions from members being able to leave a corrupt union on their own.
> But if it's members don't want to be part of the union, then why is there a union. Part of that statement doesn't jive with the other.
Because other members wanted to be a part of the union. If 70% wanted the union but 30% were forced to join then those 30% still didn't want the union afterwards, it is that simple.
No it isn't, right to work exists in the entire EU since EU enforces it. Union participation is still way higher here than in USA. Obviously right to work isn't hurting union participation that much, or unions would be dead over here.
Banning right to work is just there to protect corrupt unions from members being able to leave a corrupt union on their own.
> But if it's members don't want to be part of the union, then why is there a union. Part of that statement doesn't jive with the other.
Because other members wanted to be a part of the union. If 70% wanted the union but 30% were forced to join then those 30% still didn't want the union afterwards, it is that simple.