Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

And blocking screenshots gives Google the ability to negotiate for users against developers who might otherwise not value the privacy of the user's screen contents... so what's the difference? You can get an iPhone if you want unrestricted screen access by apps.

> You can jailbreak your iPhone

And defeat all the security of the platform? No thanks. Plus, that relies on exploits being available (which I would hope for my own sake that they are not).



That’s not the same thing at all lol.

And iPhone doesn’t give apps unrestricted screen access.


You don't see it as the same because you have different expectations/needs. I don't see Apple's control of the app store as being a value-add for me, so to me that is user-hostile. Meanwhile I do think it's important that apps can't arbitrarily look at my screen contents.


> I don't see Apple's control of the app store as being a value-add for me, so to me that is user-hostile.

Sure, I think the exact opposite is the case. Fortunately so far Apple has been on my side here. When that changes, I'll have to reevaluate the utility of the iPhone.

> Meanwhile I do think it's important that apps can't arbitrarily look at my screen contents

Hmm. Do you have any resources I could read to understand how iOS apps are able to arbitrarily read my screen contents? Thanks.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: