Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is all a result of consumer preference -- dumb TVs were once the majority of the market. Smart TVs have taken over because people prefer them.

Regulation should not be used to override clearly demonstrated consumer preferences or to force companies to produce products that few people want.



Regulation should intervene when smart tvs come with non-obvious downsides like data collection. Consumers don't get informed and have no possibility of making an informed choice here.


People know about data collection. They don't care.

The first thing we need to do to have productive conversations about privacy with non-technical people is to stop pretending they are ignorant or unable to understand trade-offs. People know that their online activity is tracked. They know that their Alexa devices record their conversations. All of this has been on the news enough times that you'd need to be living in a cave to be unaware of it.

People know this, and they have chosen to purchase these devices anyway. Maybe it's not because they are stupid and need the state to protect them -- maybe they are capable of evaluating trade-offs and their choices ought not to be second-guessed by people who think they know better.


I agree that people know about data collection and don't care to some extent, but I'd argue that they don't understand the consequences and the extent of this.

If they'd be presented a bill of what they're being overcharged through better targeting, ads, etc., the same way activity trackers show how many steps a user takes, things might change.

What I'd disagree is that people choose to purchase the device anyway, a non-tech-savy user will hardly get presented a non-smart device, wouldn't even know to search for this.

I think regulation should at least let you turn off features, e.g. it should be possible to use Airplay and turn off the app store the tv uses.

The article has convinced me to do exactly that and finally get a pfsense router to make the pihole more effective. I'll (try to) only allow each device to run the services I really want it to run. I doubt my partner, siblings, parents, etc. would be able to do that though, this needs a simple pfsense/pihole combo that runs well out of the box or regulation to protect consumers.


> The first thing we need to do to have productive conversations about privacy with non-technical people is to stop pretending they are ignorant or unable to understand trade-offs.

And then those same people complain about folks who won't vaccinate their kids, saying they're being selfish.

Without realizing they're doing exactly the same thing.

They are ignorant. They do not understand the trade-offs.


Umm. I’m not saying force TVs to stop being smart. I’m saying that you can level the playing field by saying that TV manufacturers aren’t allowed to collect user information or display ads. That’s the race to the bottom where users lose.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: