Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Regardless of how I change the map layout, traffic in/out flow or truck/car ratio I seem to get the best results when I crank accel, speed and right bias for trucks to the max and lane-change threshold and following distance to the minimum.

Which makes sense since those are basically the ideal conditions for reducing the number of obstructions low speed (merging, exiting, trucks on grade) traffic poses to higher speed traffic and reduces the effective road area of the obstruction.



You can almost always fix the traffic by maxing out acceleration. Sadly, this vindicates my real world aggressive driving behavior.


Probably you need to add the factor of accidents. Not only do they kill people, they are also the major reason for blocking traffic.


Why is it sad if it turns out a subset of people are already behaving in a way that analysis indicates promotes better flow?


Because aggressive driving is dangerous? Perhaps aggressive driving also contributes negatively to the overall flow in the real world when not everyone drives equally aggressive (i.e. through extra lane switches caused). But I don't know much about traffic analysis so idk.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: