Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I design websites that are to be used with primarily desktop screens. If you want to use an unsupported configuration such as a tiny screen or with no screen then it is not my fault if it does not work well.

Similarly, if I make a VR game I am not going to design it in a way that makes creating a pancake version of the game easier to use. If someone does create a pancake mod for the game, they should not complain about how weird the controls are or how they can only use one hand. They should take those issues up with the pancake mom developer and not with me. If people find it hard to use my website through a screen reader then they should complain to the screen reader developer to improve it. It's not my fault if there software sucks at what it is trying to do.



> I design websites that are to be used with primarily desktop screens. If you want to use an unsupported configuration such as a tiny screen or with no screen then it is not my fault if it does not work well.

In lots of countries you are obliged to make the site accessible for what you call "unsupported configurations". E.g screen readers, heavily zoomed sites etc. So yes, it will be your fault, and you are liable for what you deliver. If you're a professional web developer, this should be known.


Sure, throw me in jail for not wanting to waste my time developing stuff I have no use for in websites that are freely accessible. If countries want me to develop and support stuff that I don't want to they should pay me for it.


Again, assuming you're a professional that's just part of the job. So you will get paid for it, just include it in the estimates/your quotes. It's not optional. And really, it's not that hard to do..


VR versus pancake typically has nothing to do with disabilities. Display versus screen reader does. It's fine to exclude people who can choose to be included, but it's good to avoid exclusion when choice is not part of the equation.

If you're talking about building something that couldn't possibly be of any use to a blind person, that's one thing, but most websites do not fall into that category.


>VR versus pancake typically has nothing to do with disabilities

Keyboard and mouse as inputs leave you essentially physically disabled. Not having a full range of motion is just an much of a disability as being blind.


Ticket: "Your website isn't very accessible to people using screen readers. Could you improve it with aria tags please?"

Response: "It's not my fault you're blind. Ticket closed."


No, my response is that your screen reader sucks. For example a bad screen reader might require that an image of an apple has to be labelled apple for it to work, but a good one could just see that image and recognize that it is a picture of an apple.


Ok, and what does that change? Are you gonna invent that software for those people? If it already exists, are you gonna give them a license? All because you didn't feel like spending half an hour thinking about accessibility.


It's not my job to work on your screen reader. Complaints about its effectiveness should go towards the developers of the screen reader software. If everyone's screen leader software sucks then there is likely a business opportunity for someone to make a better one. Also you are trivializing it by saying half an hour. Even if that was true it would be half an hour for every single website in existence. That doesn't scale. What scales is making a better screen reader.


I'm sorry you see the world this way. I sincerely hope you never have to rely on accessibility tools to use the internet in the future.


That is actually an awesome idea.


I design websites that are to be used with primarily desktop screens. If you want to use an unsupported configuration such as a tiny screen or with no screen then it is not my fault if it does not work well.

It's good that you're this steadfast in your righteousness. That way you know why so many businesses don't consider hiring you.


I make websites in my free time for fun. I don't find it fun spending time developing and testing for configurations that I won't personally use. I have better things to do in my life than fiddle with CSS.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: