Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Ad technology is what enables products like Photopea to exist in the first place.


Photopea could just as well be monetized by selling licenses or by non-intrusive unpersonalized ads. When you have a great product making money from it isn't hard.

I think that 90% of ad tech is useless shit technology that just exists to take a cut of the money, without actually providing much of a value to anyone.

It's like realtors or financial advisors or other middlemen like that. The main reason for them being there is that it's a very profitable business to get a cut of somebody else's transactions.


People were making things before advertisers tried to pretend nothing else could exist without them, and will continue to do so long after advertisers are gone.


> long after advertisers are gone

May have sounded nice, but successful creators eventually become advertisers. As long as they have money to spend on marketing, they'll spend it to get in front of the right people


ad technology admittedly provides a possibility for monetization, which can justify something to an accountant, but it is completely perpendicular to use-value and technical feasibility. it does not "enable" anything to exist.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: