Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> You can't just stop evictions while not compensating landlords

Plenty of businesses were forced to close.



This would be equivalent to the government forcing those businesses to stay open and serve customers (renters) who couldn’t pay, while forbidding them from taking other customers who could pay.


When landlords close, their tenants end up back on the streets. The goal of the program was to prevent that.


Right. Eviction bans were for public health.

The government printed $9T to ensure that real estate bets didn't lose money. It worked and now housing is more expensive than ever. Landlords hit the jackpot last year.


[flagged]


The value they are providing is mostly that they put in the capital to buy and operate a house, and allow others to use the house with much less hassle, less capital investment and more flexibility


"Or maybe landlords are forced to sell."

To whom?

You know what the answer usually is? Property management firms. You know, the ones that have the resources to pursue tenants for back rent in court and efficiently line up evictions.


> You know what the answer usually is? Property management firms

Source


> Source

Self evident reality.


You could have also said "no I don't have one"


Seriously? Not everyone is meant to be home owners.


Landlords don't have even that luxury.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: