Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

To me this looks more like a competitor to CodaLab than Kaggle, and seems to target the ML research competition market. It seems unlike Kaggle, it doesn't seem to support things like notebooks, discussions, etc.

I might add that the comparison to Kaggle is added by the OP, I don't see it mentioned on the website anywhere.



> the comparison to Kaggle is added by the OP, I don't see it mentioned on the website anywhere

It's on their github page,

https://github.com/Cloud-CV/EvalAI#platform-comparison


Ah that's unfortunate, I didn't know.

That said, my point still stands. Additionally, the comparison they did is massively unfair. I'm pretty sure Kaggle competitions have most of the feature they claim it doesn't have (ex: multiple phases, custom metrics, evaluation in environments).


> Ah that's unfortunate, I didn't know.

No sweat, we can't know everything, god save the interwebs!

> the comparison they did is massively unfair.

Agreed. This is all puff


Kaggle has two parts - more popular "featured" competitions which have most of those features, but cost money to host. And then also self-hosted competitions which indeed lack all those features and are more relevant for this comparison IMO.


Their comparison chart is outright defamatory, as Kaggle features all of the below:

Custom metrics Multiple phases/splits Remote evaluation Human evaluation Evaluation in Environments

The actual rankings are: #1 Kaggle #2 DrivenData

Honorable mention but poorly managed: AiCrowd

No one else has any level of funding to incent performance.


The comparison is indeed quite old and hasn't been updated. I work with AIcrowd and would love to know why you think it is poorly managed. I know we have a long way to go!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: