That was not the case that prompted this reaction, so I don't understand the reasoning behind your comment?
The case that prompted this reaction is described in the first paragraph of the linked article. The one you refer to in the second one as an older case.
There is no mention of the older case having lead to any shutdowns, making it hard to follow your train of thoughts, since you specifically refer to this older case.
The case that prompted this reaction is described in the first paragraph of the linked article. The one you refer to in the second one as an older case.
There is no mention of the older case having lead to any shutdowns, making it hard to follow your train of thoughts, since you specifically refer to this older case.