Purism's accurate take on Apple's recent CSAM-scanning announcement is preaching to the choir since the typical consumer use-cases for an iPhone versus a Librem phone don't overlap well. Still, I'm glad Purism continues to stake-out and explain its entire reason for existing.
What do you mean? I’ve owned iPhones for 13 years and ordered a Librem earlier this week. I’m determined to use it as my daily driver, no matter how buggy it turns out to be when it arrives.
> "Still, I'm glad Purism continues to stake-out and explain its entire reason for existing."
I'm not convinced that's a good look from this blog post. See the examples they give: "a Catholic priest’s resignation after location data revealed he used the Grindr app and frequented gay bars", "might expand into terrorism, sedition, or similar categories of crime", "[catch] DMCA violations", "Your car could report when you parked illegally or disobeyed the speed limit", "Your smart irrigation system could detect whenever you watered your lawn in violation of water conservation orders".
There's more to this whole topic than "you won't be able to break laws and decieve people with casual abandon", right? Like, a presumption that your customers are actually innocent, maybe.
Innocent? INNOCENT? are you not fucking aware how judicial systems are constructed? I swear, it makes feel that to kill myself is the only solution sometimes! It's illegal to be gay in some countries, and you're born that way.
By writing this comment I violated laws for profanity (writing "fucking" in a public forum), posting about suicide (see roskomnazors' github block over a repo with humorous description of suicide), claiming that some people are born gay (falls under the law of "protection of children from negative information" that even applies in some EU countries).
Innocent! Hah. Give us a name, and we'll find what you're guilty of...
