> Within science, many ideas are "controversial" because they're demonstrably wrong.
I don't think incorrect facts are controversial within science, they're just wrong because they've been falsified.
Also, this isn't a science journal, it says on the main page that it's an interdisciplinary journal for controversial ideas. Maybe some science will get there too, but science isn't its focus.
I don't think incorrect facts are controversial within science, they're just wrong because they've been falsified.
Also, this isn't a science journal, it says on the main page that it's an interdisciplinary journal for controversial ideas. Maybe some science will get there too, but science isn't its focus.