Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why would they need "cover for closing stores that they were going to close anyway"? They can basically just close them, and no one's going to stop them or cause a problem. Why would they need "cover"?


They’re already lobbying for more policing and stricter sentencing, this is free PR from a gullible press, who won’t check to see that many of the store closures were previously announced with different reasoning given.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: