I'm surprised nobody questions the "why" did the police did that. A climate activist doesn't sound like someone who requires strong police investigation. And, for that matter, not that strong since the police didn't read the content of the emails but merely used one IP address.
But here, it's not climate activist. It's people illegally occupying private properties, iow squatting. They do it for political reasons, fine, but it's illegal nonetheless.
Also, I'm a bit surprised that these are climate activist at work here since gentrification (the process they fight against by squatting) is not really a climate issue but more a problem (as I read it) of capitalism.
(now I understand the whole issue down here revolves around disclosure of expected-to-be-protected information, but well, there's a big picture too...)
But here, it's not climate activist. It's people illegally occupying private properties, iow squatting. They do it for political reasons, fine, but it's illegal nonetheless.
Also, I'm a bit surprised that these are climate activist at work here since gentrification (the process they fight against by squatting) is not really a climate issue but more a problem (as I read it) of capitalism.
(now I understand the whole issue down here revolves around disclosure of expected-to-be-protected information, but well, there's a big picture too...)