Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I agree. It also allows the judge to slap them without agreeing with the other side. Epic didn't get anything they really wanted. This change will not make much difference. No change to single app store model. As far as I can tell, Apple will have to allow communication in the app about payment through other means. That's it. I think it is likely that Apple will require apps to offer Apple payment as an option alongside the new communication about an external payment system. That is just a guess on my part, but it wouldn't be surprising.

If I guessed right, Apple's income probably won't go down much. I would rather use Apple payment system. Lots of other people will also. It is simple and allows me one-stop management of subscriptions and purchases. Some folks won't of course, but it is the easiest choice.



> I would rather use Apple payment system. Lots of other people will also

You might be in this mindset because up until now almost only apps that nicely fit Apple’s rules have stayed in the AppStore. I hope this ruling and subsequent changes will being in more services that made no sense before but can at last come into the AppStore with their payment system.

I see this ruling as basically Apple forced to give everyone the same position that Netflix had to bargain hard. I actually hope this will be positive for Apple, with more activity, better user experience for their platform.


> I would rather use Apple payment system.

The price would be higher if you used Apple payment system. That is how companies would get consumers to be enticed to use other payment systems.

That is what Epic did with their V-bucks: either use Apple system at the usual cost, or use Epic payment system at a permanently decreased cost (20% cheaper in August 2020).


The ruling has no comment on Apple contractually limiting devs to charging the same price, so it is not at all clear that the price will be lower. These kinds of contracts are quite common in many retail sectors, so it wouldn't be unusual. Apple App store is still the only way to get on the platform. Devs will get a bigger cut.

The quote from the injunction is that apps may now provide "external links, or other calls to action that direct customers to purchasing mechanisms, in addition to In-App Purchasing."


Was there anything in the ruling preventing Apple from just forbidding higher prices on the Apple payment option?


They will simply force developers to only put payment options at the last step of the checkout process, which prevents any discount offer for one certain payment system




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: