Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

what you just said basically: if ms implemented it, its wrong etc we all know that

if google does the same, it must have been done better and therefore its ok

the point tho: the design is broken security wise. google, ms, apple, whoever else implements it, its going to be exploited, heavily specially as soon as chrome becomes n#1 browser (which will happen no matter what - certainly the no-opt-out install with a zillion of popular apps helps with that)



One has to remember that when ActiveX was introduced in Internet Explorer 3.0 the focus on security was a lot lower than in today's browser development.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: