How the trustworthiness of academics being affected by academic institutions pressuring them, relates to examples of universities forbidding and threatening their academics not to speak freely about inconvenient topics?
I'm not really sure how to explain it better. Is there something particular aspect of what I wrote that was confusing or poorly worded?
Because the issue is that the state is forbidding academics from speaking at trials, and you are roping in right-wing disdain for academia under the guise of "bias".
> Because the issue is that the state is forbidding academics from speaking at trials,
I don't see how you can't fathom how they are related.
> and you are roping in right-wing disdain for academia under the guise of "bias".
I'm making a simple observation about reality, motives, cause and effect. If you think that is some right-wing conspiracy theory or something that's your problem, not mine. It seems you are incapable of addressing what I wrote without resorting to ad hominmens.
We should all be a little more skeptical. Nobody should be above scrutiny based on their job title or profession, their prior work, or anything else.