Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

dYdX is a layer-2 zk-rollup-based exchange that is definitely not decentralized in the sense that e.g. Uniswap is on layer-1. It still, however, inherits the security guarantees of L1 despite not being directly intractable with from L1.


I already know they aren't decentralised

And yet they claim right on the front page "Decentralized"

Also L1 exchanges on Ethereum are arguably not decentralised. They delegate power to miners as a shortcut


even your L1 is 70% hosted nodes , why not just run an api on a trusted company's servers that verifies your balances using pub/priv keys and signatures

you guys are up for rude awakening when this rube goldberg machine bricks


its been over a decade now.

would like to point out that HN was also saying BTC was over valued at $1k.

Didn't listen to you guys then, not going to now either.


What does this have to do with bitcoin? Their claims don't relate to bitcoin


exactly


Bitcoin is decentralized, 13,000 nodes - mostly residiential nodes, not hosted.

You're assuming too much.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: