Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The fundamental issue is that I don't see how we can define what is a "objectively better experience", not for any sufficiently large group of people with different values and priorities.

Any attempt at establishing these comes through some central planning which leads at best to some cookie-cutter "one-size-fits-all" Apple-esque design that while functional, it's just a local maxima that destroys any kind of creativity and makes everything uniform and bland.

> Federated systems can't match the UX of centralized ones and when they come close its often because they've recentralized anyway.

I think it is easier to see it as an issue with the amount of resources that the big companies have vs the "underdogs".

If Element had the same amount of resources as Facebook, it wouldn't be hard for them to say "we will build a client that is just like WhatsApp for those that think that WhatsApp is the benchmark. For those that want something like Discord, we will build another client. And those that want to use Matrix to replace Slack will get another client that does exactly the same".

It does not matter if it is federated or centralized, what matters is that Element does not have those resources, so they can not develop as fast as their competitors and then are seen as "lagging".



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: