My summary: in social science, measurements are coarse which means the statistics cannot evaluate subtle changes. In math, logic is very precise so subtle changes can be measured.
The author makes a point that both social science people and mathematicians are trying to prove subtle things which are actually probably true. In other words the social science replication crisis is because the experiments are often impossible to perform consistently when the effect is subtle, leading to the use of inconsistent lucky draws to demonstrate things.
The author makes a point that both social science people and mathematicians are trying to prove subtle things which are actually probably true. In other words the social science replication crisis is because the experiments are often impossible to perform consistently when the effect is subtle, leading to the use of inconsistent lucky draws to demonstrate things.