Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think you'd find that most people doing large number math in their head is also off by a few percent like this model.

Sure, with pen and paper we can follow specific algorithms manually to very slowly get a precise result. If we wanted a computer to merely follow instructions, then I suspect that there are better ways...



You’re really lowering the bar for success here. It’s now unreasonable for a computer to correctly add two numbers together? Give me a break. It wasn’t even reasonable for a Pentium chip to incorrectly divide two numbers back in 1994.


Neural networks are not used to obtain exact results.


It’s amazing that this thought came out of neural network.


It's amazing that you thought that this was a sensible way to respond to a discussion.

GPT-NeoX-20B would likely have handled this situation better than you.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: