Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It comes up regularly in part because there's a lot of pop-sci reading for people to do on Stuxnet, and so people in 2022 generally feel like they know a lot about it, which makes it easy and fun to dunk on a 2011 take. What's embarrassing about the whole scene is that actual analysis of Stuxnet is almost besides the point of this blog post; it's pretty clear that some of the most strident takes on this thread are from people that haven't read any of it before.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: