Indeed. By consent I meant, without duress, which I thought was pretty clear. These folks use logical fallacies like "Appeal to Definition" in order to cloud the debate with arguments about the definitions of words.

Consent of certain actions is almost always under duress in a capitalistic society. These folks' arguments about consent not being "true" are just arguments against capitalism and for socialism, and I would agree with them, you'd probably too?

It's pretty clear cut that these animals aren't consenting, so their arguments are just moving the fencepost to gripes with capitalism.