Why was R2 chosen instead of KV db/Durable Objects? | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		melony on July 30, 2022 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Show HN: P2PCF – Low cost, low effort WebRTC signa... Why was R2 chosen instead of KV db/Durable Objects?

gfodor on July 30, 2022 [–]

Re: KV https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32286800

Durable Objects + Websockets are way, way more expensive. (At least, that’s how it looked.)

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact