Conflating the death and displacement of millions of persons with global eradication in order to say "Well, it's not going to happen!" is preeety shitty.
This list reminded me of the "contrarians" blathering about the glaciers melting. For the period in question, there was exactly one which grew a little bit. So therefore climate crisis wasn't a big deal. (Meanwhile, all of Greenland and Antarctica are melting faster than projected.)
Repeatedly rebutting the Merchants of Doubt's torrent of poo is exhausting.
any experts here who could kindly debunk/verify these assertions?
the author has gained credibility for spreading untold truths about the plight of san francisco, but it's unclear if he has similar expertise on climate change.
the claims seem logical and supposedly highlight how flawed data powers many headlines.
hopefully experts can contextualize the tweets and relevant data.
Not an expert, but as a hobbyist farmer I can feel some differences in climate, so I am on witnesses of global warming side of the conflict.
The page [1] seems like careful cherry-picking of "good" facts. Presenting text information in pictures hardly obstructing analysis, especially for those who are not fluent in English. The most disturbing for me fact in the punchline was the tweet about fracking [2], because this is a nonsense in every word.
And one more thing. Note how webpage is called - "The case against environmental alarmism". But those hopeful graphs with declining trend of annual carbon emissions were achieved because of climate activists (may I missing some other forces that stimulate businessmen to do less emissions??) and no respect to activists has been given.
