Pointing to Wikipedia as any kind of unbiased take on a person is laughable and immature.
Fortunately for my friends, family, and I, many of us appreciated and appreciate getting the other side of this pharma-first time we find ourselves living in.
> Pointing to Wikipedia as any kind of unbiased take on a person is laughable and immature.
Attacking someone's maturity for describing Wikipedia as "interesting" surely says something about your conversational instincts. Anyways, I find the passage about how Ladapo claims to have treated COVID patients at UCLA pretty concerning, since staff at UCLA appear to have come out to say that there are no such hospital records.
I think it's fair to judge that either UCLA and Lapado's colleagues are lying about hospital records or Lapado is the one lying about medical records in order to spin narratives for political gain.
I don’t see anywhere OP claimed Wikipedia was unbiased. They merely said it was interesting - which it is. He’s clearly not in the same ideological camp as his federal counterparts.
Fortunately for my friends, family, and I, many of us appreciated and appreciate getting the other side of this pharma-first time we find ourselves living in.