Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'll link a page with a chart on it, the web page relies on Javascript to actually render charts, the chart we care about here is "Electricity generation mix by quarter and fuel source".

https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/energy-data-and-research/data-porta...

Now, on the left is 1998, on the right is this year. There are a few noteworthy differences

1. The UK actually produces less electricity, partly from efficiencies and partly de-industrialisation in some areas.

2. Coal went from over 30 TWh in 1998 to 2.24 TWh today. Are we instead burning that coal in homes? Nope. Steam locomotives? A handful of quaint examples. Coal mining largely stopped in the UK.

3. Gas went from almost 30 TWh in 1998 to slightly less today. We are still burning gas to heat homes and businesses but I doubt it's more than in 1998.

4. Wind and solar went from negligible to almost 25 TWh today. It's about a third of today's electricity generation.

I don't see a way to read this which doesn't have us significantly replacing fossil fuels. Those coal mines are shut. Does the UK still have petrol stations and gas boilers? Yes, but it doesn't have many more of them than in 1998. That displacement shown is a real improvement.

It just isn't enough.



UK has massively de-industrialised, as has most of Europe (but Germany). However global industrial production, energy consumption in general and fossil fuels in particular all enormously increased since 1998.

Global numbers are all that counts, climate-wise. Plus I'm pretty sure that including imported emissions would annihilate (or even worsen) the apparent reduction for countries such as UK, France, etc.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: