What's more is it redirects to a GitHub-hosted URL. Maybe it's just me, but it seems cheap that twitter would advocate hotlinking off a GitHub server when they have so much capacity of their own.
The link was originally just a placeholder for our awesome designer @dhg (who rocked the site in like an hour).
I missed the link before it got pushed, and forgot to swap it out.
When first published it didn't even point to an actual js page. :(
Anyways, I've fixed the redirect, but should have just removed the link all together. I've updated it now to point directly to github.
The main reason that we're using github to host this (and bootstrap) rather than a proper cdn is because it makes publishing new versions super fast and easy.
Of course we don't recommend that you hotlink from github for any serious application. You should bundling these with your other assets :)
It's because they're using an url shortener in a non-twitter/character limited situation. Makes the browser need to go through a couple of jumps to load something that the user will want to load fast.
Oh, I understand. Whenever I read the Hogan site, initially, I didn't realize that they were suggesting that people actually use that URL in production.
Of course they aren't advocating that. They're just saying you can try it out by dropping that script tag on your page.
Their first suggestion, and the one they are definitely implicitly recommending, is: "Use it as a part of your asset packager to compile templates ahead of time..."
> I'm thinking it may possibly respond immediately with cached results.
Just because nobody explicitly said it - a 301 redirect is actually cacheable per §10.3.2 of RFC 2616. But google doesn't set a long cache duration - another one of your responders posted the response headers, it was 86400s which is 1 day.
