Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The way I do it in my SaaS app is there is an "attributions" page. On it I have a list of all OSS software I've used in both frontend and backend.


I like it - though it'd be hard to resist aliasing /attributions.txt to /lawyers.txt ...


Unfortunately a mention in the "attributions" page won't pay the OSS developers' rent.


If you want people who use the software you develop to pay you to use it, you should not release your software under an open source license.

You probably already knew this, I don't mean to point out the obvious. I am just confused by your comment, and others like it that frequently come up on HN these days. People saying or implying that there is something unfair about using open source software under the license terms that its developers have chosen to release it.


It's more acknowledgement than is required to use most OSS.

If the OSS developers want to generate revenue, there are plenty of paths they can follow.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: