I'm at $50/hr doing SFDC -- I think a lot of my rate is based on the fact that I'm local and there isn't a large talent pool locally for what I do (Denver, CO)
I'm thinking I could move up to $75, if I didn't get benefits (very expensive and worth it here in the US)
If I thought I was working with a product where there were more people with experience around - I'd ask for less.
ALSO: LOWER RATE = MORE CLIENTS WHOM DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT AND DON'T WANT TO PAY FOR THINGS THEY DON'T UNDERSTAND.
I do software development in the Denver/Boulder area too, but do not know what SFDC stands for. Salesforce something?
I do agree that the lower hourly rate you seek/accept/charge to clients, generally the worse quality clients you get. Clients that want lower rates tend to be more clueless, less experienced, more tight-fisted with cash, more likely to try scope creep on every milestone, and they tend to concentrate too much on rate but not on total hours or quality or other positive qualities. They're more likely to think hard things are simple and simple things hard. This latter point especially is true of most non-technical clients, but in general it's more pronounced with the cheapskate/rate-focused clients, I've noticed in my experience.
I'm thinking I could move up to $75, if I didn't get benefits (very expensive and worth it here in the US)
If I thought I was working with a product where there were more people with experience around - I'd ask for less.
ALSO: LOWER RATE = MORE CLIENTS WHOM DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT AND DON'T WANT TO PAY FOR THINGS THEY DON'T UNDERSTAND.