Yes, the GPL and the AGPL are two different licenses, that’s… the point.
“The AGPL includes additional [requirements for businesses / freedoms for end-users] which are not included in the GPL” is a feature, not a bug.
If as a software author you want companies to sell access to your software, but without sharing the source code, use GPL. If as a software author you want companies to sell access to your software with sharing the source code, use the AGPL.
If you’re running a company whose business model is “sell access to open-source software”, then it’s up to you if you want to build your business on top of GPL or AGPL software, and if you don’t like that license, you don’t use that software.
“The AGPL includes additional [requirements for businesses / freedoms for end-users] which are not included in the GPL” is a feature, not a bug.
If as a software author you want companies to sell access to your software, but without sharing the source code, use GPL. If as a software author you want companies to sell access to your software with sharing the source code, use the AGPL.
If you’re running a company whose business model is “sell access to open-source software”, then it’s up to you if you want to build your business on top of GPL or AGPL software, and if you don’t like that license, you don’t use that software.