if i use an MIT code as a "user" when i am an "intermediary" and repackage the same as a proprietary one, my "users" will be end users. they will get only proprietary code, rendering incapable of enjoying 4 freedoms.
This is the same thing. if your or your downstream end users' freedom gets restricted, that is a problem
Every single freedom ever has restricted the 'counterfreedom'. Freedom from slavery restricts your 'freedom' to keep slaves, freedom to live restricts your 'freedom' to kill, and so forth.
Perhaps I should have worded my reply differently. SSPL restricts your freedom to run the code as you wish. The AGPL does restrict your 'freedom to not share the code', but that is not one of the four software freedoms as defined by the FSF.
if i use an MIT code as a "user" when i am an "intermediary" and repackage the same as a proprietary one, my "users" will be end users. they will get only proprietary code, rendering incapable of enjoying 4 freedoms.
This is the same thing. if your or your downstream end users' freedom gets restricted, that is a problem