My guy, two posts ago you were telling me what pasabagi meant by "normal", and then when pasabagi themself comes to tell you what they meant by "normal", you're still fighting them on it?
If you just want to have an argument with someone, why don't you start an argument with someone who isn't trying to represent the underrepresented?
> Nobody defines normal as meaning specifically male, women are the majority of the population.
Not explicitly, but there are a lot of cases where female interests are treated as deviations from the norm.
I thought you said "normalness isn't defined mathematically". Which is it: do we define normal based on numbers (i.e. the majority) or not? Or does the defintion of normal just shift in whatever way is convenient for you to pretend your viewpoint is the majority viewpoint?
If you just want to have an argument with someone, why don't you start an argument with someone who isn't trying to represent the underrepresented?
> Nobody defines normal as meaning specifically male, women are the majority of the population.
Not explicitly, but there are a lot of cases where female interests are treated as deviations from the norm.
I thought you said "normalness isn't defined mathematically". Which is it: do we define normal based on numbers (i.e. the majority) or not? Or does the defintion of normal just shift in whatever way is convenient for you to pretend your viewpoint is the majority viewpoint?