Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Their revenue is massively larger than the cost to run their servers (I used to run 3000 physical servers with a small team, it doesn't cost much)

> advertising revenue for the five weeks from April 1 to the first week of May was $88 million



Ad revenue is mostly tied to sales people talking with big companies, addressing their issues.

For example: Southwest airlines has a huge number of advertisements across the internet. But Southwest doesn't want these advertisements to appear next to airport disasters. This kind of "custom request" is the bulk of $Millions+ revenues. You need to constantly cater to these company's seemingly arbitrary requests as they try to protect their brand.

Twitter fired the team that did this. And when they did, the big companies that care about their image left.


Servers may be cheap to run, but the interest bill on ~20bn of loans is expensive.


> Their revenue is massively larger than the cost to run their servers

That never seems to matter when big services shut down. It's more about VC-level opportunity cost ("will this give me unicorn-level returns?")


You’re off by a couple orders of magnitude on what it takes to run Twitter.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: