Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> None of this has to do with article, which makes a very simple point about statistics.

I am addressing a 'how is this ad hom' question not Friedman's character or the article. I seek to explain what view of him would be a critique of character not substance.



It isn't an adhom because it is irrelevant.


This isn't a very good line of reasoning because it's a non sequiteur. At this point I think you're trolling more than discussing rationally.


It is an article about a statistical concept.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: