But seriously; the thing that always depresses me about Fry is that he is almost but not quite like Douglas Adams. Their views on tech, science, religion and society were very similar, they were both pretty funny (and they were friends, too) - but Adams was a damn good writer, and Fry has never quite managed the same.
He's the stupid person's idea of a clever person. A one-dimensional actor who has played "very smug man" for so long that everyone's forgotten that he's not actually accomplished anything worth being smug about... And Hugh Laurie was always the talent in their double-act.
he's not actually accomplished anything worth being smug about... And Hugh Laurie was always the talent in their double-act.
Stephen Fry has accomplished plenty, and (not to talk the man down) I suspect has done a lot more that will stand the test of time than Laurie has. A few to start:
Last Chance To See (documentary about endangered animals)
Stephen Fry in America
The Secret Life of the Manic Depressive
Fry's Planet Word
I suspect they will all be of more interest to historians in 100 years time than multiple seasons of House.
Why of course, you're right. In, for example, The Secret Life of the Manic Depressive, where Stephen Fry discusses his personal experiences with bipolar disorder and interviews other sufferers, he is obviously just lazily rehashing his General Melchett character from Blackadder. That, presumably, is the reason the documentary won an Emmy.
I agree that Fry fanboyism is rampant sometimes, but you can't deny that he has done worthwhile things.
We're not opposed to religion we just try to practice tolerance for believers and non-believers. It is only faux-devout Americans and fundamentalist Muslims (who have more in common than either would care to admit) who see non-belief as "staunch opposition"
Has it really been such a short time? It feels more like a decade.