My point was that it's not about price (which the current top comment says).

Yes and my reply wasn't about price. No need to be snarky.

Edit: And I did reply to the substance of your comment: I think it's above all about keeping them away from ris-v, not flexibility and collaboration (though of course closer collaboration means keeping them away from risc-v). Jeez...

Why did you reply then?

I've removed the snark but perhaps it's better to engage with the substance of a comment.

Edit : You didn’t engage with the substance of the comment which was about RPi’s perspective but instead made an unrelated comment about why Arm would do the investment.

I don't know if you edited it out, but at least currently it is unclear to me that you're commenting on the perspective of RPi rather than ARM (which is TFA). Without that, it's unreasonable to be annoyed by the reply comment IMHO. Particularly with snark (which removal I applaud) is quite counterproductive.