My favorite one that isn't listed here is the Outbound Systems laptop: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outbound_Systems My parents got me one in elementary school in the early 90s to help with my learning disabilities. From what I recall they had ripped out the guts of an SE or SE-30 and turned it into a laptop. It ran on camcorder batteries. I've still got it in my basement but can't get it to boot up at all.
Maybe you should see if one of the retro computer YouTubers might be up for a rare guest computer. Adrian's Digital Basement comes to mind here but he's kind of an Amiga guy.
He's more of a Commodore guy than just an Amiga guy, but having been a long-time subscriber of his, it seems like he'll work on anything and everything. Worth sending him an email asking if he wants it at least; I've done it before and he responds pretty quickly.
I have an Outbound too! IIRC there's a weird little 7.5v battery that I had to replace to get it to boot up (roughly the diameter of a AA battery, but 1/3 the length) -- maybe check that out?
I just looked up the outbound laptop the other day. I saw one on an airplane when I was very young and I could not understand how there was a Mac that had this funny Kanagroo logo on it.
I know they had to pull the ROM from a Mac, I’m not sure what else went into the machine.
macintosh in these days were niche devices for wealthy professionals with a narrow set of requirements. There’s a reason the company almost died, windows was far cheaper and had better performance with vastly more software for the majority of users. The rest, as they say, is history.
I’m stunned that this list overlooks the brilliant PowerBook Duo and its Duo Dock, which mechanically injected and ejected the Duo like a VHS tape. https://apple.fandom.com/wiki/Duo_Dock
The Duo 280 is my all time favorite Mac. Active matrix greyscale screen worked great without backlighting turned on. Even better in full daylight.
In the mid-1990s, I could work most of the day on batteries with a super lightweight notebook. Allocate enough RAM Disk space to for a minimal Mac OS system and WriteNow for word processing. Only spin up the hard drive to save data.
Oh yeah it was a great computer. I used it to make my band's first album art using Photoshop 2.0 (using the DuoDock and a colour screen, of course). Networked with the studio's Mac IIx (running Studio Vision and Sound Tools II) using serial AppleTalk...
> you had to click and drag the floppy icon to ... the trash can
You still can! Except now the trash can turns into an "eject" icon.
But I've heard that on the original Mac and Lisa 1) there was also an eject menu item and a keyboard shortcut and 2) there was actually a somewhat sensible purpose to Apple's madness, specifically:
Early Macs (and Lisas?) kept a greyed-out icon of an ejected floppy on the screen so that you could drag and drop files onto an ejected disk (at which point it would ask you to insert the disk.) This made single-floppy systems without hard drives somewhat usable. To clean up ejected disk icons from your desktop, you could drag them to the trash (or possibly use another menu command). Dragging a mounted disk to the trash was simply a shortcut for the two steps.
At least Macs abandoned the Lisa feature where moving a file to a floppy actually moved the file and deleted it from your hard drive. Logical in terms of the "desktop" metaphor perhaps, but obviously something that led to confusion and data loss (or at least misplacement).
yeap, this PowerBook was a real gem, I had the 230 model, with dock etc, used it as subnotebook will mid 2000s - light spreadsheets and note taking! The monochrome screen was really a plus. I really miss that.
I’ve been enjoying the coverage over the last week of the 40th anniversary of the Mac. Lots of nostalgia to dig into if you grew up in 80s and 90s.
If you happen to enjoy the interesting history of the Mac and Apple, I highly recommend Jason Snell’s series “20 Macs for 2020”[1]. I just discovered it last year, but I’ve found it to be a really fascinating look at Apple and the computer industry through the lens of computers Apple released over the previous 36 years.
I've been enjoying it too as someone who only really became familiar with Apple in their 2000s renaissance with the iPod (I mean, I wasn't alive for long prior to that)
What's really wild to me is seeing the prices on these things, especially adjusted for inflation. The Macintosh XL was $10,000 in 1983, or a whopping $31,000+ adjusted for inflation!
It's quite incredible how the playing field has really levelled out these days. At least in the west, whether you're rich or not, everyone is using fundamentally the same technology. Maybe film production studios will spend tens of thousands of dollars on a specialized machine for rendering video or 3D worlds, but in most cases you're probably using the same or a similar device as the richest individuals on earth. Everyone from Taylor Swift to Elon Musk have smart phones and laptops that do the same things as mine.
Revolution in The Valley is a fun read on how the Macintosh was created, from the perspective of the engineering team, via the author Andy Hertzfeld who worked closely with Jobs but 'most of the essays in the book are about the people that did the dirty work to make the Macintosh happen, their struggles, their sacrifices and their camaraderie'. Not much unlike any modern day team working to build something hard.
The hero of this story is https://lowendmac.com/ I used to read it weekly, not certain when I stopped, but it exists in my mental list of highly esteemed websites.
As an offering of a missed strange Mac not mentioned by other comments, the OWC ModBook. Starting in 2007 (maybe '08) OWC would make your MacBook into a tablet. This may stretch the definition of "Strange Mac" since it wasn't an Apple product or a direct clone, but built in anticipation of the iPad the ModBooks digitizer was "fully compatible with Apple Inkwell®, a Mac OS X Leopard feature that provides system-level handwriting and gesture recognition instantly to all Mac applications."
Everyone knows that as the Molar Mac. They look like a tooth and were used primarily in Education. They were a decent if not hideous machine.
I learned HTML and JavaScript on one in 1998-1999. We had the option to spend study hall in the computer lab and I took it every time. I would spend an hour every day working on my Geocities site. Those were the days.
I would frankly just love to find one in decent condition to have for the memories, the transparent top grille seems to always be busted up.
It was a toss up between eMac, iMac, and molar Mac for a few years, but eventually iMac won that race and seemed to be on top for years until laptops and chromebooks took over.
It's hilarious because the eMac line is long gone and almost forgotten, but people's iPhones still autocorrect "Emacs" to "eMacs", so its legacy still lives on.
I remember helping my aunt buy one of those—my memory is somewhat hazy, but I assume it because it was cheaper than the iMac G4, with a (physically) larger display.
Now the iMac G4. That was a computer. I realize that design wouldn’t scale to larger displays…and it barely scaled to that size of display, given the issues they had with the monitor arm…but oh man, what a machine for a computer lab. Set whatever angle and height you want, then just swing the whole monitor around to show a classmate.
A tip I picked up from Gruber is if you want your phone to stop incorrecting you on certain words, add them to your Text Replacement dictionary (including capitalization variants). This works for certain choice words in the English language iPhones like to duck out on, but I got annoyed enough about the Emacs to “EMacs” or “eMacs” thing that I did it for that as well.
I did like the eMac though, had them at a school I went to.
The 2013 "Trash Can" Mac Pro has a special place in my heart. I bought one for $1000 at auction from a design firm upgrading to iMac Pros in 2017.
It has been my daily driver for the last 6+ years. Upgraded to 12 cores, 128GB RAM, 2TB SSD and an eGPU - it still works surprisingly well. 6 x 4K displays. With Sonoma, I have to apply patches to get it work. So I will finally retire it this year.
But it's been the best $2k investment in computer hardware I've made in many years.
A pretty run of the mill Mac with an strange feature was the Powerbook 1400 and its "BookCover." The BookCover was a section of the lid that could be replaced with clear plastic to display something thin underneath, such as art. Apparently a photovoltaic BookCover was offered by Keep It Simple Systems.
I own three of these (!), the TAM, the Cube, and the Mac XL.
They all look good on the shelf, but the TAM is actually still occasionally useful for running Classic MacOS software. It can boot Systems 7 through 9, although even with the G3 accelerator I fitted to it, it can't boot OS X, because it boots using the original CPU and than an extension switches control to the G3. OS X must boot from a G3.
That limitation was introduced in Panther. Mac OS X 10.0 through Jagwire support the 603/604 even though their installers block installation on those models and they don't include full driver support (hence XPostFacto).
I haven't tried it myself (my TAM is happy on 8.6) but there's a kernel patch for Tiger too:
> The Lisa line predated the Macintosh by one year, launching in 1983 for a pricey $9,995 (about $31,348 today, adjusted)
Imagine being one of the few customers of the Lisa, paying 10K USD for the best personal computer in the world, then the next year it's already deprecated.
> A curious tidbit: Lisas running MacWorks XL originally inspired the term "hackintosh."
I probably would have gone this route, to attempt changing horses mid-stream. Although, according to Wikipedia, the term "Hackintoshing" began as a result of Apple's 2005 transition to Intel's x86-64 processors. With the new ARM-based processors, I've heard this proud tradition of hacking the Macintosh is nearing its end.
We had one for a while. I can only imagine my dad somehow got it from his work as there was absolutely no way we had a $30K computer on our own dime. A year or two later it was replaced by a 128K Mac, and then later the 512k.
That last one still sits in my basement, and is perpetually on my todo list to do something with it. But I never seem to get to doing anything with it. Also can never decide if I want to try to refurbish it, turn it into an aquarium, etc etc
OMG, please please do not turn it into an aquarium. That thing is so rare that it would be a crime! If you aren't up for restoring it, maybe consider selling it (for much $$$) to somebody who would.
Please refurb it or find it a home. I used the Apple Lisa way back then and it was a lovely (if unloved) machine. Way too expensive but a real vision of what was to come.
I've come pretty close to refurbing it a couple of times. but usually wind up getting scared off by hazard warnings regarding electric shock from capacitors. Outside of one very minor repair, it's been about 40 years since I've done any sort of electronics work & don't trust myself.
My family bought an Apple IIGS around the same time, and my dad was mad forever that it was essentially a dead end as the Macintosh became the future. We switched to PC after that.
It's a cool design! I think they could've fixed nearly all of the issues with it by just installing one big, relatively quiet fan at the bottom, a la the trashcan Mac Pro.
I bought a refurbed G4 Cube in 2001 and it was a wonderful machine. I don’t remember why I sold it (I think probably too many computers on my desk), but it was great for hauling to gigs to do live recordings before I got my first Powerbook. I used to pack it, an LCD monitor, keyboard and mouse into a suitcase padded with towels.
I was surprised that there was not more mention of the clones of the mid 1990s. The Pioneer clone mentioned in the article sure is an interesting curiosity, but clone brands like Motorola (Starmax) and Power Computing were much more widely available. My brother had a really generic looking beige tower that was a 68040 Mac, from one of those brands. They were equivalent to a mid-to-high-end Performa, but significantly more affordable. I would love to hear more stories of folks who owned one of those. The clone era was short lived, IIRC once they became too successful Apple ceased the licensing program and that was the end of that.
Apparently Apple had expected that the clones would pick up the bottom end of the market - make Macs affordable to a broader range of people. While some of that no doubt happened, the greater profit was to be had in the upper end where Apple's margins were high, and Clone makers had a lot of room to undercut them.
The clone period was great in the sense of making Macs affordable to people, and really stretching the performance of systems. Power Computing was especially good at this and really gave Apple a run for its money.
At the end of the day, the vision of the Macintosh was a product where the hardware and the software were built in sync - the computer and the OS were the product together. The clone era never really fit in with this.
When Steve Jobs came back to Apple he killed the clone program because it was killing Apple, and perhaps more importantly to him, it didn't correlate with his vision of computing.
I think this article is mostly about machines that look strange. Most of those clones are way closer to “bland” than to “strange”, making it perfectly understandable that the article doesn’t mention them.
I remember seeing a Macintosh TV on display at Best Buy, I had not idea they were only available for such a short period. Though I'm pretty sure I had a catalog (as a kid) that featured it, so maybe it looms unusually large in my mind. It was probably this issue (which has it): https://vintageapple.org/catalogs/pdf/The_Apple_Catalog_Fall....
It's a little clunky as I'm not that great a designer, I also used parts that I already had around (like the power supply). Still, I think it may meet your requirement of a "Mac Classic using the tech of today". I've since added a proper video card (RTX 3060) and a nice cutout for the rear ports.
The front looks great IMO. Kudos. I have a few compacts myself and one project I need to try is tossing a Pi 5 in there and having it display on the original CRT. Would make for a cute little SSH terminal.
The most impractical Mac that I'd love to see reviewed is the iLamp, aka iMac G4.
I was in high school working after school at an Apple computer store and they let me take one home for a weekend (!!!). The refresh rate was actually one of the more outstanding features at the time as thanks to the active-matrix display, there was NO ghosting of what you speak of. But every other Mac (and non-Mac) laptop had the ghosting from the passive-matrix screens. I think you're confusing them. The Portable screen was crystal-clear as long as you were in a bright room (since it had no backlighting).
The original Macintosh Portable[1] seems like a pretty high quality machine all the way through:
Reflective active matrix LCD screen (fast response, no ghosting), full-travel mechanical keyboard, movable trackpad, built-in floppy and hard drives, expansion slots, all-day battery life. And an attractive and clever industrial design (note the cutouts for left-handed or right-handed trackball placement.)
Fantastic design for someone who didn't mind a bulky, 16-pound "portable". ;-)
In 2024, portable Macs are better in nearly every way (including battery life) but the keyboards aren't nearly as nice, and the screens aren't great in broad daylight (unlike a reflective LCD.)
(And didn't Apple subsequently invent the "palm rest" laptop design where you move the keyboard back toward the screen?[2])
Are you sure you're not thinking of other Mac laptops with passive-matrix screens? I remember that the active-matrix screen of the Macintosh Portable was so unbelievably sharp.
I think you must be confusing it with one of the later Powerbooks with passive matrix screens.
I have a Portable in the attic somewhere, and I used to boot it up and play around with it a bit. The screen was dark (no backlight) but very crisp and relatively smooth for the era.
I remember a single-panel comic from one of the Mac rags at the time -- MacWorld? MacUser? wasn't there an IT-oriented tabloid-format Mac mag? -- anyway, kind of reminiscent of a New Yorker cartoon, an adult with his arm moderately flexed and a child looking on in awe, perhaps grasping his bicep, with the caption, "That's the arm daddy uses to carry his Mac Portable"
I remember reading about the 20th anniversary Mac and wishing I had the kind of disposable income where buying one would make sense. Yeah, it was overpriced but it did look seriously cool and they would send a concierge to your home or office to set it up for you!
These all demonstrate how vital Steve Jobs was to Apple. All they could do is repackage the same thing over and over -- so many different form factors of the same thing.
Even the OS. Copland went around in circles and never landed.
I used to pirate a lot of stuff and had a couple of Copland CDs. Even installed some versions and they would never last longer than 5min before crashing.
In the part about the Mac Portable it says "if you're feeling financial". Is this a typo or do you think this might have been written in part by an LLM?
Fully-human author here. I wrote it as a joke (a play on a common phrase), since numeric keypads were often used as data entry for accountants and people using spreadsheets.
The "Molar Mac" is truly a thing to behold. Come to think of it, I would kill for a all-in-one PC with all of the creature comforts of a standard ATX motherboard...
just slap an LCD/OLED panel to the side of any ATX cases. They are ridiculosly big nowadays, especially considering most of the time the only non-integrated or mounted directly on a motherboard would be a GPU
Personaly speaking, it was nice when it was all there was, but there is no conceivable world where I would go back to those 90's machines. The machines were heavy and slow, the OS was limited, and the vast majority of features I take for granted now are missing.
I get the nostalgia, but computing is a different, and in many ways much better place than it was then.
There’s another reason why handles and the Resource Manager were so intertwined - because the 128k Mac was so limited and didn’t have paging support, resources were fair game to be shifted around to compact memory, or even purged from memory to be reloaded when needed (with the right flag set for each resource.)
I don’t think this would’ve been the design Apple would have gone with, if they had memory management when they were developing the Mac.
