> If your car runs out of fuel in the park, it is no longer breaking the vehicle rule
Unless you put some fuel in it. To get it out of the park.
But then that would be violation, so leave it there?
I think all this meta disagreement, and the diverse counterintuitive reasoning arrived at by different attempts at consistency, demonstrate how hard it is to reach convergent agreement.
The hyperlogical pedantic reading makes the most sence from a game rule perspective. But agreement on initial perspective is difficult to obtain, even given “clear” instructions.
Unless you put some fuel in it. To get it out of the park.
But then that would be violation, so leave it there?
I think all this meta disagreement, and the diverse counterintuitive reasoning arrived at by different attempts at consistency, demonstrate how hard it is to reach convergent agreement.
The hyperlogical pedantic reading makes the most sence from a game rule perspective. But agreement on initial perspective is difficult to obtain, even given “clear” instructions.