Yes of course. It works perfectly for what it was meant to be: good enough so people won't switch away from MS ecosystem to have a group chat. Nothing more.
Teams is actively developed along the lines that deliver greatest value to Microsoft at the expense of their customers (a business model increasingly popular these days):
1) implementing corporate-nerfed versions of vanity features introduced by competitors in group chat space (Slack, Discord);
2) broader integration with everything else in Microsoft's corporate ecosystem.
You can be excused for thinking Teams is just a crappy chat-based interface to SharePoint, because this is what it effectively is (Don't have SharePoint? Sucks to be you.).
Copy-paste? What are you? A corporate smartass? There's no budget left for smart-ass features - it's all in lock-in features, where the RoI is much greater.
Teams is actively developed along the lines that deliver greatest value to Microsoft at the expense of their customers (a business model increasingly popular these days):
1) implementing corporate-nerfed versions of vanity features introduced by competitors in group chat space (Slack, Discord);
2) broader integration with everything else in Microsoft's corporate ecosystem.
You can be excused for thinking Teams is just a crappy chat-based interface to SharePoint, because this is what it effectively is (Don't have SharePoint? Sucks to be you.).
Copy-paste? What are you? A corporate smartass? There's no budget left for smart-ass features - it's all in lock-in features, where the RoI is much greater.