Pasting the title text into a search engine often leads me to an MSN version of the story… https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/the-new-science-on-wh...

Though these aren't direct accessible links to the WSJ's report, the following non-paywalled articles provide coverage about the same research paper (which itself can be directly read at https://www.bmj.com/content/384/bmj-2023-077310 ):

* The Conversation (takes a stronger focus on the paper's methodology): https://theconversation.com/ultra-processed-foods-largest-ev...

* Medical News Today (also takes a more technical perspective, though includes more emotionally charged words in the opening): https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/ultra-processed-fo...

* The Guardian (general news coverage) https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/feb/28/ultra-proces...

Yes, I tried archive.is and 12ft, all failed. I have to say, I never success with 12ft even 1 time, what a shit website.

Anyone got a more advanced trick on WSJ link?

I will say if you have the disposable income then paying for the Wall St Journal is worth it imo. It's one of the few news sources that I trust for generally reliable information that, as long as you avoid the opinion sections, tends to be uniquely unbiased.

I stopped paying for them years ago when they started publishing kind of nonsense hit pieces on Tesla. Of course since then I ended up losing all respect for Elon Musk, but back in the 2010s there was a massive media war against Tesla and seeing them join it made me cancel my subscription. The resporting was biased and inaccurate to a fairly obvious extent.